|
|
Newsline
Canada
|
|
Ontarians Encouraged To Honour And Remember Veterans
TORONTO, Nov. 6 /CNW/ -
All Ontarians are
encouraged to honour and remember veterans and keep the
memories of their contributions alive during Veterans'
Week, said Minister Responsible for Seniors Aileen Carroll
at the start of Veterans' Week.
"We need to help future generations remember the
contributions the sacrifices veterans made to preserving
our freedom," said Carroll. "On behalf of the Government
of Ontario, I encourage everyone to take time during
Veterans' Week to pay tribute by participating in local
Legion activities, school assemblies or faith services, or
just by saying thank you to a veteran."
Ontario is continuing to expand its efforts to ensure
future generations never forget the debt of gratitude owed
to our veterans. Ontario government activities for
Veterans' Week include:
- The launch of an advertising campaign for licence plates
that feature a poppy and are available only to veterans
- A Tribute to the Fallen Ceremony on November 9,
honouring soldiers who died in the past year
- The second annual provincial Ceremony of Remembrance at
the Veterans' Memorial on Remembrance Day, November 11. |
|
|
|
Federal Minister Finley Announces Overseas Expansion Of
Foreign Credentials Referral Services
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/releases/2007/2007-11-06.asp
New Delhi, India, November 6,
2007 — The Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of
Citizenship and Immigration, today announced the expansion
of services to help immigrants from India and China get
their professional credentials assessed and recognized in
Canada as quickly as possible with the assistance of the
Foreign Credentials Referral Office (FCRO).
While in India, the Minister announced the opening of a
new office of the Canadian Immigration Integration Project
in New Delhi. The new office, which is centrally located,
is in response to increased demand in the region.
“The Government of Canada is committed to helping
newcomers succeed, and one way to do that is to help them
before they get to Canada,” said Minister Finley. “Too
many newcomers have come to Canada only to learn after
they’ve arrived what credentials are needed. By expanding
our FCRO programs overseas, we’re helping prospective
immigrants to get a head start by providing information on
the foreign credential recognition process and the
Canadian labour market.”
Today’s announcement adds service on a rotational basis in
the states of Gujarat and Punjab, which are major sources
of skilled immigrants from India. In China, rotational
services have been added in Beijing and Shanghai so
services are available to more potential immigrants. Until
now, the orientation sessions have been available in three
cities in India, China and the Philippines. To date, more
than 1,200 prospective immigrants have registered, and
benefited. Overall, participants say they are more
confident about being able to settle successfully when
they arrive in Canada. |
|
|
|
Love Thy Neighbours — Please
http://thecanadianimmigrant.com
By George Abraham
Think of Canada as a huge social experiment with 32
million people. New people are being introduced every year
— at the highest rate in the world — and predictably,
there is concern about how the new and old are getting
along.
Thirty-five years after inventing multiculturalism for the
world, Canada is having second thoughts. It’s no longer
about what Canadians can do for new immigrants; it’s about
what new immigrants should do to fit in. The new mantra
might well be “reasonable accommodation.”
The cradle for this shift is in Quebec, which is debating
the obligations of society toward new immigrants. Headed
by a renowned sociologist-philosopher duo, the
Bouchard-Taylor Consultation Commission on Accommodation
Practices Related to Cultural Differences is travelling
across the province tapping public opinion.
In one of its first hearings, the commission heard from a
public servant who was clearly tired of what she saw as
the Canadian tendency to bend over backward. “We took
Catholicism out of our lives, but left all this room for
all the other religions … [A]pparently, it’s not going
both ways. People are expecting to arrive here and still
live like they are in Baghdad,” she lamented.
More recently, a 67-year-old retired engineer in Saguenay,
said, “I fear that foreigners will impose their values on
us, so we’ll lose our place. It’s like I invite someone
into my home and he slowly shows me the door.”
The tone of the debate is not uncommon in Western
democracies, particularly in much of Europe, the United
States and Australia. But it is happening in a country
that gave the world the concept of “multiculturalism” and
itself stands as a poster child for its success. Canadians
rarely thump their chests, but when they do they like to
crow about their invention of the policy of
multiculturalism.
The word itself is open to interpretation and means
different things to different people. It can mean
tolerance, a “mosaic” (as opposed to a “melting pot”)
model of assimilation, pluralism, but, above all, the
equality of all cultures. According to Janice Gross Stein,
director of the Munk Centre for International Studies at
the University of Toronto and a contributor to the
recently published Uneasy Partners: Multiculturalism and
Rights in Canada, “Canadians of all backgrounds and
cultures are free to be themselves.”
That is what the author of the policy, former prime
minister Pierre Trudeau, had in mind when he legislated it
in 1971. But the world has changed since then. With
Chinese and Indian nationals dominating new arrivals that
constitute the highest rate of immigration in the world,
making a fifth of the population now foreign-born,
newcomers have become a more visible presence in Canada.
Importantly, the majority of them are not of English or
French stock.
In Uneasy Partners, Stein sees a natural evolutionary
process unfolding. “Now, I would argue, we are in a second
stage, where a deeply embedded culture of individual
rights is challenging cultural and religious practices
that infringe on our concept of equality. Our perpetual
dialogue on these issues has shifted direction.”
Take it from me, this debate has just gotten started and
will move beyond Quebec. |
|
|
|
StatsCan Study: Economic integration of immigrants'
children
1996 to 2004
Highlights
Young women with two immigrant parents had significantly
higher hourly and annual earnings than young women with
Canadian-born parents
…..Some visible minority men with two immigrant parents
appeared to have a significant disadvantage in earnings
compared to their peers with Canadian-born parents
Monday, October 29, 2007
http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/071029/d071029a.htm
Much has been written about the widening gap in earnings
and low-income rates between recent immigrants to Canada
and their Canadian-born counterparts. However, the
challenges associated with the integration of immigrants
often extend beyond the first generation.
This study, published today in the October 2007 edition of
Perspectives on Labour and Income, focuses on
second-generation Canadians aged 17 to 29—young men and
women born in Canada to two immigrant parents between 1967
and 1982.
Using data from the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics,
the study compares, over a six-year period (either 1996 to
2001 or 1999 to 2004), the earnings of these
second-generation Canadians who have a strong labour force
attachment to those of their peers with Canadian-born
parents. It also compares the two groups' family
characteristics, educational attainment and geographical
distribution, and the extent to which these factors may
lead to differences in earnings.
Taking education levels into account, the study found that
young women with two immigrant parents had significantly
higher hourly and annual earnings than young women with
Canadian-born parents during the entire six-year period.
Among young men, on the other hand, there was little
evidence of such a second-generation earnings advantage.
In fact, everything else being equal, some visible
minority men with two immigrant parents appeared to have a
significant disadvantage in earnings compared to their
peers with Canadian-born parents.
In the case of women, roughly half of their advantage in
hourly earnings was due to geographic distribution.
Three-quarters of young Canadians with two immigrant
parents were concentrated in Ontario and British Columbia,
and more than three-quarters lived in large urban centres.
In contrast, half of their counterparts with Canadian-born
parents lived in less economically prosperous regions,
such as Atlantic Canada, Quebec, Manitoba and
Saskatchewan. About 60% lived in smaller cities, small
towns and rural areas.
A large part of the annual earnings advantage among young
women with two immigrant parents was also because they
were less likely to have been married or had children.
By the end of the six-year period when they had reached
the ages of 22 to 34, less than half of women with two
immigrant parents had been married. Only a third had given
birth to, adopted, or raised children. In contrast, over
60% of those with Canadian-born parents had been married,
and close to half had had children.
The situation was quite different for young
second-generation men. The study found little evidence of
an advantage in hourly or annual earnings relative to
their third- and higher-generation male counterparts.
In fact, generalizations about young second-generation men
were difficult to make since they tended to be more
heterogeneous in terms of earnings than their female
counterparts.
Part of the extra heterogeneity arose because visible
minority status had no bearing on women's earnings, but it
had a large impact on those of men.
The study found that among young men born in Canada to two
immigrant parents, visible minorities fared markedly
worse. Everything else being equal, their earnings were
significantly lower than those of young men with
Canadian-born parents.
The earnings of second-generation men who were not visible
minorities, on the other hand, were no different from
those of men with Canadian-born parents. In fact, the
study found some evidence suggesting that the earnings of
those with one immigrant parent might be higher. |
|
|
|
Internet Is A Major Tool For Canadians
Excerpt From:
http://www.canada.com
CanWest News Service Wednesday, October 31, 2007
OTTAWA -- The Internet
has changed the way Canadians live, but also the way they
learn, according to a new Statistics Canada report with
the latest data on how Canadians are using the Internet.
The study found that in 2005, more than one-quarter of
Canadians -- an estimated 6.4 million -- used the Web for
education, training or school work.
The study, using data from the 2005 Canadian Internet Use
Survey, then took a closer look at the characteristics of
the people who are going online for educational purposes.
People who reported using the Internet from home for
education tended to be younger -- average age of 34 -- and
to have more education than other users or non-users. They
were also more likely to be in the paid labour force and
less likely to be married, reflecting their lower average
age.
More Canadians going online for education-related reasons
were students, Statistics Canada said. Nearly 80 per cent
of all full-time and part-time students reported logging
on to the Internet for education purposes.
The most common type of education-related use of the
Internet was to research information for project
assignments or for solving academic problems, the study
said. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goan Voice designed and compiled by
Demerg Systems India,
Campal Trade Centre, Next to Military Hospital, Campal,
Panjim, Goa-403001
Tel: +91 832 2420797 Email:
info@goanvoice.ca
|
|
|